The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. We’ve had 2 updates since then (3.3.7 & 3.3.8) and still no fix. I have already raised the Iris and single frame rate for interlaced source in 3.3.6 issue, and ida.topazlabs said it would be fixed in the next update. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) And by the way, this is a forum and everyone can have his/her view on the product. I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. I sent a screenshot of this issue before where you see the Preview should be running not on pause but the Preview progress slider is far behind the processing and not moving anymore. I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace. Hello ida, the preview gets stuck on almost all video files I process, most often shortly after the beginning of the processing, rarely later in the processing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |